*home

   

 

Business tax

Information

 

 

Index

Artic Systems

Section2

Section3

Section4

Section5

 

 

 

 
 

 

Artic Systems

25 July 2007

The House of Lords has found in favour of Geoff Jones in the landmark tax case Jones v. Garnett (also knows as “Arctic Systems”). The law lords rejected HM Revenue and Customs’ appeal to tax Geoff Jones on dividends paid to his wife, Diana. The judgement marks the dramatic end of a tax case that has gripped accountants and small business owners for the last four years and dominated all recent SME tax planning. No further appeals are possible under UK law.

In their judgment, handed this morning, the lords ruled that:

  • The Jones created an arrangement in the nature of a settlement when they planned, and subscribed for one share each, and set up their company Arctic Systems Ltd
     

  • However, the exemption for gifts between spouses also applied and so dividends paid to Mrs Jones were therefore not income arising under a settlement.

The Jones were jubilant after the landmark decision, which was not totally unexpected by HMRC, (the Court of Appeal had previously and unanimously found in favour of the taxpayer), but Geoff Jones said that he is "extremely angry" about HMRC's failed "stunt".

HMRC will now have to review and totally re-write its guidance on settlements and also review its guidance on outright gifts. Small business taxation is somewhat topical as the Muirless Review on the subject expected this Autumn, and there is speculation as to what view the new chancellor will take on small companies and their dividend policy.

source Accountingweb

 

 

January 2006:

In December 2005, in what many say is a victory for commonsense, the Appeal Court judges found in favour of the taxpayers in this case consequently it would seem that months of worry and uncertainty are at an end.

 

Even though HMRC were refused leave to appeal they have now announced that they will be seeking leave to appeal to the House of Lords.  The result of this should be known in February.

 

We will be contacting clients as necessary to review their particular arrangements once the full ruling has been absorbed however in the mean time, and certainly for the 2005 tax returns, we will be advising clients to prepare returns in accordance with the Appeal Court decision.  Clients should be aware however that in the event of the decision being reversed tax returns may have to be amended resulting in extra tax, interest and perhaps penalties.

 

 

Original posting

November 2005

Do you run a family company?  Do you draw dividends instead of salary?  If that’s a yes+yes this case will concern you.

 

Strictly this is a personal tax issue because, if HMRC can show that dividends are being drawn in such a way to divert income away from a higher rate tax payer to a lower rate taxpayer, then the higher rate taxpayer has to declare the income as his/her own.

 

This particular case made its through the Commissioners and High Court in the government’s favour and has just finished a further three days of hearing at the Appeal Court at which the Judges reserved their decision.  We await their decision in up to eight weeks time.

 

No two cases are the same and there are still some grey areas however it’s important we discuss the situation with each client this affects.

 

 

top

 

 

 
 
   

 

Section2

Body

 

top

 

 

 
 
   

 

Section3

Body

 

top

 

 

 
 
   

 

Section4

Body

 

top

 

 

 
 
   

 

Section5

Body

 

top

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  *home